Posts
The Democrats called the event a political circus by the GOP. Then the Democrats went ahead and spoke about Donald Trump, gun control, and police violence against African Americans before asking Comey anything even remotely substantive.
Without the cry of racism, the Democrats would be like Nancy Pelosi with her hands tied behind her back: speechless.
Comey testified that some of Clinton's claims--some made under oath--about her use of a private email server were "not true," as Comey refused to use the word "lies." In spite of this, it begs the question as to whether our fork-tongued Democratic presumptive nominee committed a felony.
My question would be: if Hillary Clinton shot Donald Trump 41 times on the Chris Matthews show, and killed the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, would she be indicted for a felony?
Certainly not by Matthews or the mainstream media.
Comey admitted Clinton's email [mal]practices put America's secrets at risk and that her actions clearly constituted the "definition of carelessness," so it stands to reason that Comey made the decision not to pursue charges against her based on that.
What Comey really did was to use his own interpretation of the law regarding 'gross negligence' and 'intent.' The latter issue is irrelevant under the law but Comey thinks it should not be and made it relevant.
This is precisely why the GOP is upset with him.
And the issue of intent is usually based on circumstantial evidence, of which there was plenty. Just the fact that she used a private server, lied about that and her use of multiple devices, deleted records, used a burn-bag, then sent and received classified material over her server is enough to indict almost anyone but Clinton.
James Comey let Hillary Clinton off the hook, for whatever reason he had. The optics look bad, but it doesn't seem to matter when it's the Clintons.
I hate to say it but America is beginning to feel like a banana republic and the elite are treating us like monkeys.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment