Posts
The bodies had not yet been removed from the Pulse Orlando nightclub when liberals went into "political mode," calling for more gun restrictions, because everybody knows, if it's illegal for terrorists to get guns, they'll leave us alone.
Oh wait, what if they get pressure cookers? Or knives? Or what if they try to run us down with their car? Baseball bats? Box cutters?
Liberals believe that going after law abiding citizens' guns, that will somehow magically solve the problem. They ought to ask the Jews in Nazi Germany how that worked out for them--oh wait--they can't--the Nazis hauled them off and killed them.
But the senate liberals jump on the Obama bandwagon and heckle Ryan over gun control. If you want to heckle Ryan, there are plenty of other things you can heckle him over, but gun control is not one of them, nor should senators be the ones to do the heckling. It's very juvenile and leftist, which in itself, is an oxymoron.
The scumcrumpet who bought the weapons used in the killing of 49 and wounding of 52 innocent people, purchased them legally. The problem isn't the guns, the problem is the laws that protect people who should not be protected.
And the only way to not protect the people who should not be protected, who should not have the same rights as American citizens, is for our Congress to declare war on radical Islam. (I don't particularly like the word 'radical' when describing these terrorists--I prefer the word 'orthodox' Muslims because they are not doing anything that is out of line with true Islamic scripture.)
If we declare war on ISIS, the Taliban, al Nusra, al Qaeda, al Shabaab, al Gore and al Sharpton, we would have the latitude to defend ourselves more effectively.
The left vehemently opposes the Second Amendment and Trump is correct in saying that Hillary wants to abolish it and take away all our guns. Some leftists are saying that the AR-15 is not a "recreational rifle" so there is no reason for Americans to own one. Where does it say in the Constitution that our guns are to be used for hunting or target practice? They are for self protection and the AR-15 is very good at doing that.
The disruption on the floor began when Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) tried to ask Ryan when bills restricting gun use would be considered after the House paused for 16 seconds of silence (their attention span couldn't go the full minute) to honor those killed Sunday in the Islamic terror attack.
Clyburn was about to note that Friday is the one-year anniversary of the Charleston, S.C. mass shooting, but before he could finish, Ryan ruled his question out of order (which it was) and directed the House to move to the next vote.
Well, that put a burr in the skivvies of many on the left and they left the House floor in a huff(ingtonpost) and some yelled: "Where's the bill?" and "No leadership!"
After the House calmed down, House Democratic Leader Nancy-Botox-Pelosi told reporters that Democrats have "had enough" of moments of silence after mass shootings when Congress doesn't do anything to tighten gun laws like the left believes will keep people from getting their hands on guns and then kill infidels.
Fox News reported that a handful of Democrats left the House floor during the moment of silence. One such libtard was Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) who said in an interview that he's done with the moments of silence typically held on the House floor after mass shootings, calling them "obnoxious expressiions of smug incompetence." His district is near Newtown where a gunman killed 20 first-grade children and 6 adults at an elementary school.
Tightening gun control laws would not have prevented that shooting or this latest one, but Himes, like other liberals, is out of real ideas and simple solutions that fall into the leftist ideological agenda, is what they demand. Also, larger safe spaces where only liberals are allowed to go.
To his credit, Ryan said: "As we heal, we need to be clear-eyed about who did this. We are a nation at war with Islamist terrorists. Theirs is a repressive, hateful ideology that respects no borders. It is a threat to our people at home and abroad. Our security depends on our refusal to back down in the face of terror. We never will."
But on the other hand, how will our "refusal to back down in the face of terror" help us in this war when our leaders refuse to identify exactly who we are fighting, or more accurately, who is fighting us? If we don't identify our enemy, we don't identify his tactics, ideology that inspires him, and to which targets he will give priority.
Obama never says "radical Islam" and refuses to mount a serious attack against ISIS (who he refers to as ISIL because the Levant includes Israel and that's his unconscious anti-Zionist Islamic roots coming out, I suspect). He talks as if this has nothing to do with Islam when, in fact, a quick skimming of the Quran, Hadith and Sira would show that it is intimately tied to the religion of peace.
It's time for lawmakers to come together on this problem and quit asserting their bs political points. Gun control has nothing to do with this at all. And heckling on the House floor is not acceptable behavior from our elected senate. If they can show how tightening restrictions on gun control could defeat terrorism, I'm all for it, but who are they kidding?
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment