The Scientific Method of Liberals

A fact is something that actually exists, or something known to exist or to have happened. A fact is a truth known by actual experience or observation, or known to be true. It is something said to be true or supposed to have happened.

A 'myth' is an antonym for 'fact'.

A "factsheet" was issued by the City of New York by their Commission on Human Rights. The cretins involved claimed that it is a "myth" that biological men are not "real women." 

Obviously, none of these liberals know much about biology and psychology. 

The commission published a "myths vs. facts" document on gender identity and gender expression after they received myriad criticism over its transgender guidance forcing businesses to accommodate 31 (!!!) different gender identities. Trees and animals were not included.

One of the "myths" on the list is that "Transgender women are not 'real' women, and transgender men are not 'real' men."

In other words, your gender is what you believe it to be, not what gender hides inside your underpants, in your genes, and in the biological differences that make up gender.

With that line of thinking it stands to reason that people who believe they are not a real person, but rather believe that they are, say, a rooster, are a rooster--even if they walk like a duck. Thus, they would have the right to have sex with consenting chickens, if chickens were able to give consent, and no liberal would be disturbed by this act of bestiality.

So if a person believes (s)he's a rooster, then that person is a rooster--regardless of what his or her birth certificate indicates and (s)he should be treated as a rooster.

Therefore, if biology is not to be used as the basis for gender, it stands to reason that it should not be used to determine species. Proof again, that facts do not matter to liberals . . . only feelings . . . nothing more than feelings.

The schizophrenics are running the asylum.


Tweet