Posts
What she said was that she is better than Sanders and Trump because she's better "vetted and tested" and that Trump is only "pretend" successful [with his pretend jet, pretend money, and pretend front-runner for the GOP].
This statement may become historical, not in the realm of politics, but in the classrooms of Psychology 101 as an example of delusional thinking.
Of course, colleges would need to become far less leftist for that to happen.
If Benghazi was a test, and how she told the families of the dead that the cause of the terrorist attack was a video from a guy with the same first and last name, then she failed the test.
If deleting 30,000 emails from her illegal private email server was her way of being vetted, then she's delusional beyond the pale.
If failing the Washington D.C. bar exam illustrates her success, then she's successful, at least in her mind.
If supporting the Iran nuclear deal is a sign of her successful decision-making, then she's successful, just as she was in failing to curb Russia's aggression.If yelling at Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for 45 minutes on the phone and screwing around with our closest ally in the Middle East is a sign of success, then Hillary is successful.
But obviously she isn't successful--she's a do-nothing, fly everywhere, loud-mouth wife of a former president who, if she'd never married him, would be "baking cookies," as she says.
And while on one hand she wants to be the first woman president of the United States, she would have her husband deal with the economy--maybe because "boys are better at math than girls."
I suspect, however, that Hillary would be a failure even at baking cookies--it actually takes talent and you can do it without bragging.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment