Debbie Wasserman Schultz pulls a Gruber re Hillary

"I don't give a damn what James Comey says about his involvement with Hillary's personal server.

"Hillary isn't undergoing an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; it isn't what they do, especially with people like our former First Lady and Secretary of State. It's a security inquiry, just like she said," the DNC Chair-dummy, Debbie Wasserman Schultz claimed, in other words.

Even with the FBI making it clear that what his people are doing IS A FREAKING INVESTIGATION WHICH IS WHY IT'S CALLED THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION!! the empty head of the Democratic party is insisting that Hillary Clinton isn't even the focus of the probe.

"Secretary Clinton isn't even a target of this inquiry, investigation, whateverrrr "I" word you want to use," Schultz lisped to Fox News. 

When Fox News asked her to back up her statement the ditzy Schultz claimed that she has "repeatedly been told that" but refused to say who told her. (Is it possible that she and Bill spoke about it during a quiet moment they shared?)

If Hillary Clinton's private server, which is in itself illegal to use in any government position dealing with classified material, is the intent of the investigation, how does that not involve the owner/user of that server? And why would Hillary Clinton's senior aides be interviewed about Hillary Clinton's server and their involvement with it, not involve Hillary Clinton too?

And why was Bryan Pagliano, the installer of that server for Hillary Clinton, granted immunity for his testimony about Hillary Clinton's server? 

The FBI had already confirmed in court papers that Hillary Clinton's "use of a private e-mail server" is the focus of the investigation. 

FBI Director James Comey even said that he was not familiar with the term "security inquiry."

Remember the words of Jonathan Gruber: "the stupidity of the American voter" made it important for him and Democrats to hide Obamacare's true costs from the public. "That was really, really critical for the thing to pass. But I'd rather have this law than not."

So perhaps for Debbie Downer, like Gruber, the ends justify the means, and the ends in this case is to get a felon elected president of the United States of America.

How crazy is that?





Tweet