Appeals Court rules against Obama--finally

Barack Hussein Obama is our president but he is not our supreme ruler. He acts as if he would like to be in charge of every aspect of our lives, but he was finally stopped from making yet another lawless move.

Obama's executive action to prevent the deportation of about 5 million illegal aliens received a well-deserved setback yesterday when a federal appeals court upheld a federal judge's injunction blocking the action.

In a 2-1 decision by the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, the hope that Obama's executive action would be implemented, prior to his leaving us to thrive in 2017, has been thwarted, at least for now. If the Obama administration appeals this decision, which it probably will, the process could take months to play out, and the case could return to Texas federal court as well.

The plan is an illegal overreach and fully 26, of Obama's 57 states, have challenged it. (He must have confused the number with the 57 varieties of the Heinz Corporation--or maybe Kerry did because his wife owned the company.)

U.S. District Court Judge Andrew Hanen granted the temporary injunction preventing the implementation of the order in February. He believed, as did the states, that legalizing so many illegal aliens would be "virtually irreversible" and cause the states "irreparable harm."

Of course, the Obama administration argued that they have the right to stop the deportation of selected groups of immigrants (aka Muslims), including children who were brought to the U.S. illegally. In fact, if Obama had his way, there would be no borders, no police, no drug laws and no America as we know it.

GOP Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, said that "President Obama should abandon his lawless executive amnesty program and start enforcing the law today."

Saul Alinsky would disagree with Abbott.

The Justice Department stated that it disagreed with the court's decision, claiming that Obama's action would "allow DHS to bring greater accountability to our immigration system by prioritizing the removal of the worst offenders, not people who have long ties to the United States and who are raising American children."

Sure, it would bring about as much "accountability to our immigration system" as their refusal to pass "Kate's Law."



Tweet