Puppies, Hillary and Truth

Many people wonder whether Hillary Clinton can kill a puppy on national TV and get away with it. Certainly she can with her faithful followers who believe the idea of electing a woman president, whether she is honest, intelligent or qualified, is more important than anything else. It's the demographics vote, like the one our first black/gay president won, that matters to people with low information who simply want to be part of "a first."

Yesterday's hearings by the House Select Benghazi Committee did little to change the minds of those who either love the fact that Hillary has lady parts, and those who see her for the incompetent, immoral, unethical, lying scumcrumpet the Clintons have shown to be over the years.

But it may have made a difference to the independent voters who haven't yet taken stock in the Scandal Queen and her minions.

Rep. Susan Brooks (R- IN) asked Clinton if she spoke to Chris Stevens, the ambassador who was killed there along with three others (Information Officer Sean Smith and Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty). Clinton began to filibuster a reply but Brooks cut her off with "Yes, or no."

Hillary believes she spoke to him once but didn't recall when, and there was no record that she was telling the truth.

Clinton also claimed that Chris Stevens could have "reached out" to her but didn't. It turns out that there were over 600 email requests over the year asking for more security for the compound (aka temporary mission compound) but no addition measures in men or material were given, not even a request for sandbags for fortification.

Clinton claimed that all security for Benghazi was handled by "security professionals," and did not see that as part of her job. In fact, there didn't seem to be very much that was part of her job except for traveling, which she appears to view as a huge accomplishment as opposed to an event.

Each Representative on the panel had three ten-minute opportunities to question Clinton and there was no sense of coordination of how the questions were generated. Nobody followed up on questions such as "Why did you continue to tell the families of the dead that it was the film that caused the riots?" "When did you know for sure that the film had nothing to do with the attack and that it wasn't spontaneous?" and then "Why did you immediately tell your family, the heads of Syria and Egypt that it was an attack and still carry on the false narrative to the families?"

Nobody pressed her.

She was not asked how she could justify arresting Nakoula Basseley Nakoula for producing the YouTube video when it's his Constitutional right under the First Amendment to do so. The charges of violating his parole was bull crap. 

Of course when an Egyptian court on November 28, 2012 sentenced Nakoula, several other Coptic Christians and Terry Jones to death, that was a lot worse, but hey Hillary, don't you respect the Constitution?




Tweet