Posts
Former Maryland governor and Democratic presidential candidate Martin O'Malley believes the U.S. should allow at least 65,000 Syrian refugees to enter the country, but not in his home town. Not now, not ever.
Our so-called president, Barack Obama proposed to take 5 to 6 thousand refugees into the country this year, but O'Malley FEELS that if Germany, which is a country with one-fourth the U.S. population can take in 800,000 refugees, we should do more.
Since when is this a competition with another country? Since when does another country set the example for the U.S.? It's almost like assuming our leader would want an international organization like, say, the U.N., to dictate their definition of law and order. Wait . . . never mind.
Libtard O'Malley said in a statement on Friday:
Of course we know that this is a real problem, partly due to failed U.S. leadership in Libya and Syria with our so-called president whose loyalties are obfuscated by his ego-driven need for a legacy. Nobody wants to see dead babies washed up on some beach.
The truth, however, is that the U.S. cannot help everyone in the world. We already have borders more porous than a bullet-ridden sieve, and those wealthy Gulf states, as well as Tehran, refuse to assuage the situation by taking in refugees.
Instead, these same Gulf states are financing terrorism and have no plans of taking in these hundreds of thousands of Muslims in spite of the room their countries have to accomodate these desperate people.
The 65,000 refugees O'Malley suggests we take in, is not a huge number, I admit, but it will be the siren call to many more refugees and among them will surely be terrorists who will do what they love doing.
One British man wrote, "Please do NOT let these illegal immigrants into your country. I live in England where we are almost overrun with these economic leeches. They live in London's parks, have been pictured urinating on War Memorials and fornicating in public as well as pushing street crime figures through the roof."
I will not categorize all of these refugees that way; to do so would be akin to saying all cops are targeting black people. That's the "Black Lives Matter" mentality.
But I certainly believe that crime will increase and among the refugees will be terrorists who will take advantage of our good intentions.
The road to BOOM! is filled with good intentions.
Tweet
 |
| "Kumbayah mah Lord" |
Our so-called president, Barack Obama proposed to take 5 to 6 thousand refugees into the country this year, but O'Malley FEELS that if Germany, which is a country with one-fourth the U.S. population can take in 800,000 refugees, we should do more.
Since when is this a competition with another country? Since when does another country set the example for the U.S.? It's almost like assuming our leader would want an international organization like, say, the U.N., to dictate their definition of law and order. Wait . . . never mind.
Libtard O'Malley said in a statement on Friday:
"I support the call from humanitarian and refugee organization for the United States to accept at least 65,000 Syrian refugees next year. If Germany--a country with one-fourth our population--can accept 800,000 refugees this year, certainly we--the nation of immigrants and refugees--can do more."O'Malley claimed the number of refugees the U.S. is scheduled to accept next year isn't enough, but he doesn't want them living anywhere near him, one can imagine. The image of that toddler's body washing up on a Turkish beach should motivate the U.S. to do more, he said, but the images of Islamic State beheadings, not so much.
Of course we know that this is a real problem, partly due to failed U.S. leadership in Libya and Syria with our so-called president whose loyalties are obfuscated by his ego-driven need for a legacy. Nobody wants to see dead babies washed up on some beach.
The truth, however, is that the U.S. cannot help everyone in the world. We already have borders more porous than a bullet-ridden sieve, and those wealthy Gulf states, as well as Tehran, refuse to assuage the situation by taking in refugees.
Instead, these same Gulf states are financing terrorism and have no plans of taking in these hundreds of thousands of Muslims in spite of the room their countries have to accomodate these desperate people.
The 65,000 refugees O'Malley suggests we take in, is not a huge number, I admit, but it will be the siren call to many more refugees and among them will surely be terrorists who will do what they love doing.
One British man wrote, "Please do NOT let these illegal immigrants into your country. I live in England where we are almost overrun with these economic leeches. They live in London's parks, have been pictured urinating on War Memorials and fornicating in public as well as pushing street crime figures through the roof."
I will not categorize all of these refugees that way; to do so would be akin to saying all cops are targeting black people. That's the "Black Lives Matter" mentality.But I certainly believe that crime will increase and among the refugees will be terrorists who will take advantage of our good intentions.
The road to BOOM! is filled with good intentions.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment