Posts
The chair-cretin of the DNC, Dummy Wasserman Schultz, could not answer "Hardball's" Chris "Tingles" Matthews question: "What's the difference between a Democrat and a socialist?"
Usually Matthews throws underhand softballs to Democrats, but this time Obama's love child got tough with Lady Duh Duh.
Instead of explaining the differences, Schultz chose to not answer the question but instead, attack Republicans, as if that was a sufficient answer.
"What is the difference between a Democrat and a socialist?" Chrissy asked, freezing Duh Duh like a deer in the headlights.
"I used to think there is a big difference. What do you think it is?" leftist Matthews asked again. "A Democrat like Hillary and a socialist like Bernie Sanders."
Bobbing and weaving, Schultz's anemic reply: "The more important question is what is the difference between being a Democrat and being a Republican?"
Undaunted, Matthews again asked the overachiever: "What's the big difference between a Democrat and a socialist?"
Having skipped that class in high school, Schultz again did a progressive fandango: "The relevant debate that we'll be having this campaign is what's the difference between a Democrat and a Republican."
She blathered on: "The difference between a Democrat and Republican is that Democrats fight to make sure everybody has an opportunity to succeed and the Republicans are strangled by their right-wing extremists."
So, she was implying that Republicans don't want everyone to succeed. How mindlessly superficial and false. The reality is, Democrats continue to hold the poor hostage to entitlement programs that ensures they will never stray from the fold, while Republicans believe that we all have an innate ability to achieve reasonable success, if we work for it.
So even with the answer she was willing to provide to skirt the question, Schultz was unable to articulate an answer that actually had substance. But honestly, has she ever said anything of substance as DNC chair?
The difference between a Democrat and a socialist is almost inconsequential. You can't tell them apart anymore. Both want big government, with total control, which translates to total dependency upon Big Brother.
Tweet
Usually Matthews throws underhand softballs to Democrats, but this time Obama's love child got tough with Lady Duh Duh.
 |
| Dummy Wasserman Schultz |
Instead of explaining the differences, Schultz chose to not answer the question but instead, attack Republicans, as if that was a sufficient answer.
"What is the difference between a Democrat and a socialist?" Chrissy asked, freezing Duh Duh like a deer in the headlights.
"I used to think there is a big difference. What do you think it is?" leftist Matthews asked again. "A Democrat like Hillary and a socialist like Bernie Sanders."
Bobbing and weaving, Schultz's anemic reply: "The more important question is what is the difference between being a Democrat and being a Republican?"
Undaunted, Matthews again asked the overachiever: "What's the big difference between a Democrat and a socialist?"
Having skipped that class in high school, Schultz again did a progressive fandango: "The relevant debate that we'll be having this campaign is what's the difference between a Democrat and a Republican."
She blathered on: "The difference between a Democrat and Republican is that Democrats fight to make sure everybody has an opportunity to succeed and the Republicans are strangled by their right-wing extremists."
So, she was implying that Republicans don't want everyone to succeed. How mindlessly superficial and false. The reality is, Democrats continue to hold the poor hostage to entitlement programs that ensures they will never stray from the fold, while Republicans believe that we all have an innate ability to achieve reasonable success, if we work for it.
So even with the answer she was willing to provide to skirt the question, Schultz was unable to articulate an answer that actually had substance. But honestly, has she ever said anything of substance as DNC chair?
The difference between a Democrat and a socialist is almost inconsequential. You can't tell them apart anymore. Both want big government, with total control, which translates to total dependency upon Big Brother.
Tweet
No comments:
Post a Comment