Welcome to my blog. Here you will find information that is both interesting and useless. You can even see how Steve, my camera, sees the world through my eyes, or get your hands on my latest novel, Jihad Joe at:


Thanks for visiting. Hope you enjoyed the coffee and cake. Sorry we ran out of donuts.

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

SCOTTeVEST's Scott Jordan calls Fox viewers 'f---ing idiots'

The not-so-bright founder of SCOTTeVEST, Scott Jordan, said on his Facebook page that his company advertises on Fox News because the viewers are "f---ing idiots." 

Now who is the f---ing idiot who would go on social media with a statement that tarnishes his own company by insulting his customers? And what does that say about the product?

The f---ing idiot founded the company with his wife in 2000. It's a vest with a lot of useless pockets to carry all one's crap. Jordan failed to clinch a deal with his idea on ABC's Shark Tank with his "Technology Enabled Clothing" (TEC) patent in 2012, The Blaze reported.

Although the idiot stepped down from the company's management last year, the schmuck still holds the title of CEO. 

The company disavowed Jordan on Wednesday after he publicly described an incident with someone who recognized him from the TV ads.

"I love meeting new people that recognize me and my company from all our television commercials," he posted and since deleted. Butt he post was on a screen grab by a "Shark Tank" fan blog. "I am on the ski lift and the following exchange just happened and happens often: I ask, 'What network they saw me?' Invariably people say Fox News.

"I laugh to myself, and tell them that we primarily advertise on Fox because we find their viewership to be extremely gullible and much easier to sell than other networks," Jordan wrote, admitting his vest sucks [as much as he does]. "The look on their face at that time is priceless. I am not kidding you. I get to tell them they are [f---ing] idiots while getting rich off them."

SCOTTeVEST posted a statement on its website calling Jordan's comments "offensive and inexcusable." I will not elaborate but you can imagine how freaked out the company must have been when they read how Jordan not only said what he did about their customers, but what he implied about the product.

Company spokesman Luke Lappala told The Blaze that Jordan had since deactivated his Facebook and Twitter accounts.

This idiot reminds me of Jonathan Gruber, the guy who said that the Democrats depended upon the stupidity of the voter in order to pass Obamacare. 

Jordan apologized in a Medium post calling his words "incredibly rude and inaccurate."

You just have to believe the idiot was pressured by the company to make the apology.

 The thing is, if anyone buys one of those vests, they'd be proving him right.

Media bias? Don't be ridiculous

Is Donald Trump a racist? Is Barack Obama an anti-Semite? 

CNN likes to bring up the first question but wouldn't touch the second one for all the tea in China.

CNN actually asked that question about Trump to one of their guests. Look at the video below and watch the lunacy of the left. They would never ask a question like this to Obama, in spite of his negative policies toward Israel.

The guest, of course, is delighted to give his biased, uninformed opinion about Trump, who he doesn't actually know personally.

Trump is being called a racist because of his immigration policies but the truth is, Hispanics and blacks are the ones who would likely suffer most and his border plans are well received by these minorities.

In fact, according to a new poll, the GOP is trusted over Democrats to handle our border situation.

Breitbart writes:
A new poll shows the GOP is more trusted than Democrats to handle the hot-button immigration issue--and large percentages of Hispanic and African-American voters are backing President Donald Trump's "Buy American, Hire American" immigration policy.
The respondents were asked: "Who do you trust more to handle the following issue?" The answer for immigration was 40 percent for Democrats, 41 percent for the GOP and a huge 20 percent for "Don't know" or "No answer." That is a large percentage of non-answers, and likely hides a block of pro-Trump supporters who fear to respond truthfully.
The poll of 1997 registered voters was conducted by Morning Consult for Politico. The poll was taken January 20 to January 21, ensuring it includes some reaction to the Democrats' decision to filibuster the 2018 budget to win amnesty for illegals.
The poll also shows that Democrats only scored 44 percent trust among Hispanic registered voters. In contrast, the GOP scored 37 percent trust--and the Hispanic 'Don't knows' added up to 19 percent.
That is a huge turnaround for the Hispanic voters as the Democrats had them eating out of their hands for years. Now they're beginning to understand that Democrats have been using smoke and mirrors on them while conservative policies actually work.
Among African-Americans, the Democrats scored 63 percent in the trust question--but the GOP scored 20 percent, and 17 percent were "Don't knows.' That score helps explain rising support for Trump among black voters. The score may rise as Democrats continued to turn their attention away from blacks towards immigrants.
Trump only scored 8 percent of the black vote in the presidential election, so this is a significant increase of black voter support. He also had only 28 percent support among Hispanics so 37 percent support and 19 percent "Don't knows" is a substantial increase in Hispanic support and probable support.

People are getting wise to the lies of the media as they attack Trump from everything to whether he's a racist or whether or not he wears dentures.

I saw a great meme today showing the White House physician, Dr. Ronny Jackson being asked the President's weight. His reply: "He weighs 0.73 Oprahs."


Monday, January 22, 2018

Ruth Bader Ginsburg has her own #MeToo too

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg confessed that she, like many other women, had her own brush with sexual harassment and gender inequality.

Of the #MeToo movement the 84-year-old Brooklynite said: "It's about time."

"Every woman of my vintage knows what sexual harassment is, although we didn't have a name for it," the elderly SCOTUS liberal told a crowd during a forum to promote her new documentary "RBG" at the Sundance Film Festival on Sunday. "The attitude toward sexual harassment was simply, 'Get past it. Boys will be boys.'"

Ginsburg told NPR's legal correspondent and longtime liberal friend Nina Totenberg, about an incident that she said occurred when she was a law student at Cornell University in the early 1950s, before most people were born.

Ginsburg spoke about her concerns with her chemistry teacher over her "abilities" ahead of an important exam. He comforted her and told her he'd give her a practice exam to make her more comfortable with the test.

"The next day--on the test--the test is the practice exam. And I knew exactly what he wanted in return," Ginsburg claimed. "That's just one of many examples," she added, without actually giving an example of what happened.

But Ginsburg refused to slough off the professor's inappropriate unexplained gesture. After the exam, she walked straight up to him and confronted him, she said.

"I went to his office and I said, 'How dare you! How dare you, you--" she said without clarifying what the end of her sentence was. "And that was the end of that."

When Ginsburg taught at Rutgers Law School in 1964, she quickly saw how she was treated differently than her male colleagues. 

Because Rutgers was a state school in New Jersey, she knew she'd be taking a pay cut, but when the dean told her how big a cut, she was mortified. She asked a male colleague who had graduated from law school about the same time as her what he was being paid and the difference was quite substantial.

"Ruth, he has a wife and two children to support. You have a husband with a good paying job in New York," the dean responded.

That was the very year the Equal Pay Act had passed," Ginsburg said. "That was the answer that I got."

So the Women's March on Saturday was never about equal pay and equal rights for women--it's now law, just like protection from harassment in the workplace is law. 

The Women's March was actually an anti-Trump march because that's the main issue women really care about.

Newly released text messages of FBI lovebirds

Nearly 400 pages of additional text messages between two FBI love birds were released regarding the Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into alleged collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian officials.

The newly released texts show that Peter Strzok and his mistress, the beautiful pretty little Ms. Lisa Page, knew that charges against Democratic presidential candidate and former failed secretary of state Hillary Clinton, would not be filed in spite of her illegal activities. And they knew this even before Clinton was interviewed by the FBI. They even knew it before over a dozen others involved in the case were interviewed.

So like our politicians who are exempt from the government shutdown, Obamacare and insider trading law, Clinton was exempt from the Espionage Act and people in the FBI were never going to prosecute her.

Strzok and Page were removed from the probe last summer [but not from each other's arms, much to the chagrin of their spouses] after it was discovered that their private messages between them included anti-Trump rhetoric and allusions to plans of undermining him in office if, God forbid, he got elected. 

Which he did; sorry snowflakes.

One political love letter between the Strzok and Page, date July 1, 2016, discussed then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch's decision to accept the FBI's conclusion in the Clinton investigation. Her announcement came just days after it was revealed that Lynch covertly met with former President Bill "I Did Not Have Sex With That Woman" Clinton aboard her plane in Phoenix.

"Timing looks like hell," Strzok texted to Page.

"Yeah, that is awful timing," Page responded. She later added: "It'a a real profile in couragw [sic], since she knows no charges will be brought," alluding to the fact that they knew Hillary would be exonerated and the title of the book "Profiles in Courage" by John F. Kennedy, another philanderer.

Four days later, then-FBI Director James "Lordy-Lordy" Comey announced that no charges will be brought against Clinton.

Last month, the DOJ released hundreds of text messages that the FBI lovebirds traded before they joined the Mueller investigation. Many messages spoke to their observations of the 2016 election and also discussed the Clinton investigation. Based on the texts, GOP lawmakers contended the texts reveal the FBI and Mueller group to be politically biased and tainted against Trump.

Now the FBI should be made to prove that these missing texts between Strzok and Page are not an "obstruction" of congressional oversight or "destruction of evidence."

And with all of this mess, I suspect that nobody will be made to pay under the law.

Sunday, January 21, 2018

Burning stuff for jihad

The joys of jihad on her face
Minnesota, Land of a Thousand Lakes and even more jihadis -- A former college student was arrested after going on a fire-setting jihad at St. Catherine University in St Paul, her alma mater.

She reportedly set eight fires but was incompetent in her quest to kill non-believers, so there were no serious injuries, thank the Lord.

Nineteen-year-old Tnuza Jamal Hassan expressed extreme Islamist ideas to her roommates and was arrested for setting a series of fires. This was done in retaliation for American military "crimes" in Iraq and Afghanistan, Star Tribune reported.

"You guys are lucky that I don't know how to build a bomb because I would have done that," she told the cops and fire investigators upon her capture.

Hassan also does not know how to build with Leggos, how to milk a cow, iron a shirt, read a map or use a washing machine.

Court documents state that "Hassan said she started the fires because she's been reading about the U.S. military destroying schools in Iraq and Afghanistan and she felt that she should do exactly the same thing.

"She said that her fire-starting was not as successful as she had wanted. She said the most successful fire she set was at Saint Mary's [the residence hall] where she set a couch on fire."

The brilliant jihadi wrote a letter to her roommates while a student at the school. She espoused "radical ideas about supporting Muslims and bringing back the caliphate." The roommates, evidently scared and aware that Hassan was as crazy as jihadis tend to be,  turned the letter over to campus security.

Hassan appeared at her bail hearing with an improvised burqa--an Muslim cloth body tomb--consisting of a black niqab over her siren-like face that makes men go insane, and a large white sheet draped over her head to send a message to all men out there that she is "not available to rape." She also wore a mandatory orange jump suit, making it appear as if she was planning to go 'trick or treating'.

APA calls for end to 'arm chair' psychiatry

The American Psychiatric Association, the largest of its kind in the world, is calling for an end for people diagnosing people they don't like in absentia. In other words, they don't approve whatsoever of "arm chair" diagnosing such as we've seen the leftist media do with President Trump.

The APA released a statement earlier this month reaffirming its commitment to "The Goldwater Rule," which says that it's unethical for psychiatrists to diagnose public figures they have not personally examined.

And speaking of personally, I believe psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers who practice this quackery should lose their license and pay a fine.

In the case of Yale University psychiatry professor Dr. Bandy X. Lee, she claimed to have recently met with over a dozen Congress members to discuss the President's mental health, without having met Mr. Trump. Since Dr. Lee has no license to practice psychiatry, the fine should be greater since she has less to lose.

The APA argues that public speculating/diagnosing by psychiatrists "undermines the credibility and integrity of the profession and the physician-patient relationship."

In other words, the APA is hammering home the point that psychiatry is actually a real profession. 

"A proper psychiatric evaluation requires more than a review of television appearances, tweets, and public comments," the statement read. "Psychiatrists are medical doctors; evaluating mental illness is no less thorough than diagnosing diabetes or heart disease [as Sanjay Gupta did without actually meeting with the President]. The standards in our profession require review of medical and psychiatric history and records and a complete examination of mental status. Often collateral information from family members or individuals who know the person well is included, with permission from the patient.

"Using psychiatry for political or self-aggrandizing purposes is stigmatizing for our patients and negatively impacts our profession."

But it looks like Dr. Lee didn't get the message and went ahead anyway. 

Maybe Trump can sue her, as is his wont.

CNN: Gov't Shutdown Risks Asteroid Strike

The Certainly Not News (CNN) network says that the Trump government shutdown risks an undetected asteroid strike on the Planet Earth. That is, if there was no Trump government shutdown, we'd see the asteroid heading our way and would have time to kiss our kids and our butts 'goodbye.'

Now, according to "reporter" Tom Foreman, if an undetected asteroid hits us, you can blame it on President Trump because the Schumer Shutdown is actually his fault.

Everything bad is Trump's fault, and everything good is due to the effects of the Obama presidency.

"In space same year [2013], for more than two weeks, NASA reportedly stopped monitoring potentially dangerous asteroids. A big one, by the was, is expected to brush by Earth on February 4th," Foreman pontificated.

The hack acknowledged that most federal government services such as Social Security, the post office and air traffic control, would remain unaffected, but those asteroids . . . those damn asteroids.

Speaking to Jake Tapper, another CNN stooge, Foreman said the following:

Tapper: "It's not just the government workers, if the shutdown happens. It will have a real cascading effect on the economy."

Foreman: "Yeah, that's absolutely right. If there is no deal as these immigrants who came as children, the so-called DREAMers would be thrust into a dangerous legal limbo. Some 9 million children covered by Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP). But plenty of other Americans who have nothing to do with any of that could also feel the impact."

But the impact of an asteroid, well that's something we'd want to know is about to happen, and with a Trump government shutdown we'd never see it coming before it destroyed life on Earth, like it did with the dinosaurs.

Of course shutting down the government sucks for some people, like the  over 800,000 government workers who will be placed on furlough. The military, the only part of government that actually functions like a well-oiled machine, will have to wait for their pay, but they will remain on duty.

 However, to blame Trump for the shutdown is nonsense. Everything the left wants is in the budget and DACA isn't even a real issue yet--not until March--if the planet survives.

Shutting down the government is only proving that the country doesn't need big government . . . the shutdown is a good thing, in a way.

Saturday, January 20, 2018

European leaders facing growing public disdain, do a 'Trump'

The E.U. is struggling to solve their Middle East and Africa migrant problem as wave after wave of Muslims leave their s***hole countries to relocate and create a new s***hole country that they can call their own. The migrants are being held on a G
reek island awaiting future destinations.

So while the U.S. Democratic Party condemns President Trump for alleging he called certain African nations "s***hole countries," the European politicians, even those on the left, didn't join in on the condemnation. They have immigration problems that Trump is trying to avoid, and the political winds are blowing methane.

So while Europe's hypocritical leaders have spoken out against Trump, now they're keeping quiet because the problem has finally become obvious to the formerly oblivious populations across the continent.

The New York Times described a "ringing silence across broad parts of the European Union, especially in the east, and certainly no chorus of condemnation." 

It's a populist revolt emerging--Germans sick of the groping of their women like the Cologne New Year's Eve debacle January 1, 2017. East Europeans sick of the crime, the rapes and the anti-Semitism that has become commonplace.

While Merkel threw open the door to Germany and won praise and was given Times' Person of the Year--she opened the door to crime, terror attacks and a myriad of social problems. Her approval sank into the toilet and she had to move to the right to retain power--a move proving that her moral compass is in her nether regions.

She pushed for a "burqa ban" in December 2016 and promised the 2015 migrant inundation, for which she didn't take personal blame,  "cannot, should not and must not be repeated."

Still, her party Christian Democrats (CDU) took a big hit in the national elections last September. The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party surged and Merkel was fighting for her job. Now the CDU looks to convince former coalition partners, the left-wing Social Democrats (SDU), to form another coalition to keep her in power.

Merkel wants to cap the refugee influx to about 200,000 people per year--a significant decrease from the hordes that entered Germany in 2015.

Obviously, the migrants/refugees/immigrants will not be screened based on merit or education, but on some sort of quota. This is not what Trump wants for us, but it seems too late for Merkel and her ilk to be picky regarding who they let in.

Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary have been significantly more stringent in asserting their own sovereignty in dealing with immigration, in spite of opposition from E.U. officials, none of whom actually lives near any migrants.

Hungary erected a border fence along with even more border security measures and "did a Trump" by asking the E.U. to pay for half of it. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has used language that makes Trump's sound like Pope Francis. In an interview with Germany's Bild, he called migrants "Muslim invaders" and called multiculturalism "an illusion."

I agree with Orban in the first instance, but see multiculturalism not as an illusion, but as a "liberal illusion."

In a follow-up interview this week, Orban siad, "If you take masses of non-registered immigrants from the Middle East into your country, you are importing terrorism, crime, anti-Semitism, and homophobia."

Orban is the man! He has the courage to speak what he, and those of us willing to be honest, and therefore politically incorrect know is the truth.

"[In Hungary] there are no ghettos and no no-go areas, no scenes like New Year's Eve in Cologne. The images from Cologne have deeply moved us Hungarians," he said. "I have four daughters. I cannot help my children grow up in a world where something like Cologne can happen."

Even French centrist Emmanuel Macron, who beat Marine Le Pen, a strong anti-migration right-wing opponent, has rejected an open-arms migration approach for France. And while many saw Macron's landslide victory as a sign that Europe was opening its arms again to migrants, in a New Year's speech he admitted: "We can't welcome everyone, and we can't act without rules."

Gee what an novel idea. Why didn't Obama think of that one?

France has even taken a tougher line on economic migrants, which caused his own party to criticize him as being too tough and catering to the right-wing.

Reuters reported that opponents point to a new bill to increase detention times and deport anyone not classified as a refuge from a war zone. 

But Macron followed this up Tuesday with a visit to the former "Jungle camp" at Calais, (aka "The S***hole of Calais") a huge refugee camp at the port to the U.K. that was deconstructed in 2016. 

In a meeting with British Prime Minister Theresa May, Macron is expected to demand a renegotiation over the border arrangement with the U.K., including more funding from them to take on more Muslim invaders. The U.K. is expected to jump at the offer since they've decided to leave the EU highly motivated by migration issues and a need for better border security.

Perhaps they should build a wall.
Meanwhile, here at home
In 2016, Britain allowed immigration by child asylum seekers from Calais who had family members in the U.K. It turned out that photos of these "children" depicted what one Conservative MP described as "hulking young men" presenting themselves as children.

In other words, the Muslim invasion.

In Austria, a right-wing government was formed in December led by Sebastian Kurz, a 31-year-old who vigorously campaigned on a tough migration stance.

Austria will take over the presidency of the E.U. Council this summer and Kurz said in an interview that one of his top priorities will be "border control to stop illegal migration to Europe."

We shall see what really happens since Kurz told the German media that the continent's view on migration is now much closer to his own.

"There has been a lot of movement in recent years," he said. "For example, the German position is now much closer to ours than it was two years ago. Many states have moved in the right direction. Now we need a focus on proper protection of the external borders of the EU and not just the constant debate about the distribution of refugees within the European Union by quotas."

Quotas are just plain stupid.